The Senate President, Bukola Saraki has won in his request for judgement to be delivered over a suit he filed against the EFCC and the chairman of CCT stating that his fundamental human rights was violated.
The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim Auta, has granted the request by Senate President, Bukola Saraki, to direct Justice Abdul Kafarati to deliver judgment in his (Saraki’s) case.
This is coming after Saraki sued the chairman of the tribunal, Danladi Umar and others involved in his trial, before the Federal High Court.
Saraki, in the suit filed for him by his lawyer, Ajibola Oluyede, is contending that his trial before the Code of Conduct Tribunal, as currently constituted, was a violation of his right and that there was no way he could get justice.
He also told the court that while the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) was currently investigating Umar for alleged bribery and at the same time prosecuting him (Saraki) before the tribunal, it was impossible for the CCT chairman to do justice and act independently in his (Saraki’s) case.
It would be recalled that after hearing arguments from parties in the case, Justice Kafarati had scheduled judgment for March 22, but when parties arrived court, he changed his mind at the last minutes and informed parties that he was withdrawing from the case and returning the case file to Justice Auta for reassignment to another judge.
Justice Kafarati hinged his decision on publications by some online media, which he (the judge) said had cast him in bad light and portrayed him as a compromised judge.
He said no matter in whose favour his judgment went, the losing party would habour the impression that he was influenced.
But, after Saraki dragged him to court, he has now been compelled to give the judgment he reserved. This was after Oluyede wrote Justice Auta on March 23rd, demanding that he prevailed on Justice Kafarati to deliver his withheld judgment, no matter who benefited, saying that, “It is our argument in the suit that the Code of Conduct Tribunal cannot act independently the way it is currently constituted because we believe its chairman, Danladi Umar, who is currently under investigation by the EFCC, cannot be independent in deciding a case being prosecuted before him by the EFCC.
“We have also contented that the EFCC, by admitting that the investigation of the case against our client was done by a special task force, as against the requirement by the provision in Schedule 3 of the Constitution, has usurped the exclusive duties of the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB). It is on that basis we argued that our client cannot get justice under the current arrangement and asked the court to quash the charge,” Oluyede said.
It was, however, learnt on Tuesday that Justice Auta had acceded to Saraki’s request and directed Justice Kafarati to proceed and deliver his judgement.
Justice Auta’s decision was hinged on the fact that none of the parties in the suit complained about the conduct of Justice Kafarati and that the judge could not disqualify himself from further handling the case based on mere allegations made in the media.
Lawyers representing parties in the suit confirmed this development on Tuesday and that Kafarati had rescheduled the judgment for this Friday.