Vice President Yemi Osinbajo has identified 11 ways through which corruption is perpetuated in the Judiciary.
He also says reforms in the Judicial arm demands that the National Judicial Council (NJC) should raise an independent panel to investigate allegations of corruption against judicial officers.
Osinbajo’s views are encapsulated in a seminal paper in Transparency International’s Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems.
He wrote on “Sub-national reform efforts: the Lagos State experience” which The Nation obtained yesterday, a day after he said in Ado Ekiti that all the three arms of government in Nigeria –executive, judiciary and legislature are corrupt.
In the 2007 paper, Osinbajo listed some of the most common methods of practising corruption in the Judiciary as follows:
Fabricating rulings in exchange for money
Blackmailing litigants into paying for, or excluding evidence
Making decisions based on instructions from local government, party or senior judicial officials, rather than the law or facts
Assigning, dismissing, delaying or refusing to accept cases, or refusing to properly enforce court decisions
Extorting kickbacks from intermediaries for passing cases to certain judges
Trading law enforcement services for personal gain
Taking bribes from the plaintiff and defendant (or their lawyers) or both
Manufacturing court cases
Embezzling court funding
Bowing to the demands of local officials, criminal networks, local clans, social networks or economic interests
Abusing the power of judges to order suspension of business operations, the confiscation of property, the eviction of tenants, or fair compensation and labour rights.
The VP reviewed past efforts put in place to stem corruption in the nation’s Judiciary.
His words: “Corruption is generally regarded as pervasive in Nigeria, affecting many of its institutions. The Judiciary is no exception. The main forms of judicial corruption relate mainly to either pure bribery or, in sensitive cases, political interference from government or party officials.
“The problem worsened during Nigeria’s 30 years of military rule, one of the worst features of which was the weakening of all the justice institutions.
“In 1994, Gen. Sani Abacha’s regime established a panel of inquiry, headed by the renowned retired Supreme Court Justice Kayode Eso, to look into the activities of members of the Judiciary.
“The panel recommended a series of reforms aimed at curbing judicial corruption. The panel also indicted 47 judges for alleged corruption, incompetence, dereliction of duty, lack of productivity or corrupt use of ex parte orders. The military regime failed to implement the recommendation of the Kayode Eso panel.
“The civilian regime, which took power on 29 May 1999, set up another panel to review the work of the Kayode Eso panel. Following the report of the second panel, some of the indicted judges were either dismissed or compulsorily retired.”
He also shared his thought on the disciplinary procedures for judges and argued that the National Judicial Council (NJC) does not have the final say.
He added: “With regard to the discipline of judges, the reform policy dictated that every case of judicial corruption would be investigated and submitted to the NJC, which would then appoint an independent investigation panel to make recommendations.
“Prior to the NJC’s creation in 1999, the JSC had been the sole adjudicator on disciplinary issues, providing an avenue for local interference in the process
“It is important to note, however, that the NJC does not have the final say on the disciplining of judges. This lies with the governor or president as the case may be.”
He recalled how 91 judges in China, including a Vice President of the High Court, two presidents of the intermediate courts and two presidents of the basic courts, were charged with corruption.
He said: “In the celebrated Wuhan Court bribery case, it appeared to be systemic and organized at all levels of the Judiciary.
“In Wuhan, Hubei Province, 91 judges were charged with corruption, including a Vice President of the High Court, two presidents of the intermediate courts and two presidents of the basic courts
“The ringleaders, two former Wuhan intermediate court vice-presidents, were ultimately convicted of corruption and sentenced to six and a half and 13 years in prison.
“Ten judges under their supervision were also sent to jail and a 13-member group was found to have pocketed almost 4million Yuan (approximately $510,000). The investigation implicated more than 100 other judges and court officials, who were disciplined or reassigned to other courts. Finally, 44 lawyers were investigated and 13 were charged with robbery.”